Sunday, 2 January 2022

Lost Spring-Anees Jung-Questions-Answers-From Lost Childhood-Class XII English

 2. Lost Spring (Anees Jung)

Q.1    What is Saheb looking for in the garbage dumps? Where is he and where has he come from?

Ans.  Saheb is a ragpicker like many of his companions. Sometimes he finds a rupee or a ten-rupee note. He lives in the Seemapuri area of Delhi. His family came to India from Bangladesh in 1971. Searching garbage dumps for valuable things is a wonderful job for him.

Q.2    What explanations does the author offer for the children not wearing footwear?

Ans.  The author says that the rag-pickers do not wear shoes. To remain without shoes has become a tradition for them, But she also thinks that it might be an excuse to hide their poverty.

Q.3    Is Saheb happy working at the tea stall? Explain.

Ans.  Saheb is not happy working at a tea stall. Previously he was master of his own job. Now his master is somebody else. It became a burden for him.

Q.4    Where did the author see Saheb one morning? Why was he there?

Ans.  One morning Saheb was standing near the gate of a club. He was watching two young men playing tennis. They were dressed in white. Saheb also liked to play tennis. But he was not content(satisfied) to see them from a distance.

Q.5    What does the author say about the tennis shoes that Saheb was wearing.

Ans.  One day Saheb was in tennis shoes. Those were discarded(thrown) by a rich boy. There was a hole in one of them. To wear tennis shoes was Saheb’s dream come true. But to play tennis was still out of his reach.

Q.6    Describe the people living in Seemapuri.

Ans.  The people living in Seemapuri are very poor. They are about 10,000 in number. They are rag-pickers. They have no basic facility of life. Their houses are mud-built with roofs of tin or tarpaulin. Food is more important to them than identity.

Q.7    What is the importance of garbage for the people living in Seemapuri.

Ans.  Garbage is a gold mine for the people living in Seemapuri. They earn their bread from it. They search for valuable things in the garbage. They get money by selling them. Garbage has been the source of their livelihood.

Q.8    What does the writer, Anees Jung, tell Saheb to do? How does she realise her mistake?

Ans.  One morning the writer, Anees Jung, asks Saheb as to why he does not go to a school. Saheb says that there is no school in his neighbourhood, At this, she promises him to build a school for him. A few days later, Saheb reminds her about the promise she had made. She realises her mistake felt small in front of him.

Long Questions-Answer

Q.1    How does Anees Jung describe the life of Seemapuri ragpickers?

Ans.  Seemapuri ragpickers live a life of hell. They cannot dream of living a normal life. They came from Bangladesh in 1971. Since then, they are living in Seemapuri. Their houses are of mud, with roofs of tin or tarpaulin. They have no basic facility of sewage, drainage and running water. They are about 10,000. They are all rag pickers. Garbage is gold mine for them. Their children help them in rag-pickers. They are unable to go to school because of poverty. Food is more important to them than anything else. Garbage is the only source of their livelihood. As identity cards, they have only ration cards. They can buy grains with their help of them.

Q.2    What does the writer Anees Jung, want Saheb to do? How he makes her feel embarrassed (ashamed)?

Ans.  The writer sees rag pickers every morning. Saheb is one of them. One morning she asks him why he does rag-picking. He replies that he has no other work to do. Then she advises him to go to a school. At this, Saheb replies that there is no school in his area. The writer promises him to open a school. She also tells him to join her school then. A few days pass away. One day Saheb meets the writer. He asks her if her school is ready. She replies that it takes time to build a school but, at the same time, the writer feels embarrassed (ashamed). She should not have made a false promise to Saheb.

.                              Lost Spring by Anees Jung (Part 2)

 Short-answer type Questions

(Notes made by Shish Pal Chauhan: My YouTube Channel: Shish Pal Chauhan Yamuna Nagar)

 Q1. Who was Mukesh? What was his dream?

Ans. Mukesh was also one among thousands of boys, who are engaged in the odd work of making bangles. His dream was to come out of the vicious circle of poverty. He wanted to become a garage mechanic. For this, he would go on foot to reach the garage to get his traing.     

 Q2. What makes the city of Firozabad famous? (Lesson 2: Lost Spring)

The city of Firozabad is famous for the production of bangles of various colours. This odd job is done by so many poor families engaged in this work. About 20,000 children are also engaged in this work.

Q3. What is the condition of the children working in the glass bangles factories of Firozabad?                                                                        

  Or What are the hazards of working in the glass bangles industries of Firozabad? (Important)

Ans. The glass bangles industries of Firozabad do not provide good human conditions for the thousands of its workers. They have to work in small rooms which have no ventilation for fresh air and light to come there. Actually, the workers have put their eyes in danger while working in these dark places with the light of furnaces only.

Q4. Describe the locality where Mukesh lives?

Ans. The locality in which Mukesh lives is not a Healthy place to live in. The streets are narrow and one can notice heaps of garbage lying there. The domestic animals and human beings love in those streets emit a foul smell. The huts they live in have no windows and the doors are about to fall anytime.

Q5. What does the author say about the girls and boys working in dark hutments?

Ans. In the dark huts, small boys and girls sit near the flickering oil lamps. They weld the pieces of coloured glass into circles of bangles. Their eyes are more adjusted to the darkness rather than the light of the day. That is the reason why they lose their eyesight before reaching adulthood.

Q6. Who is Savita? What is she doing? What does the writer wonder about her?

Ans. Savita is a young girl, who is sitting near an elderly woman. She is in pink dress and soldering pieces of glass. The writer wonders if she knows about the sanctity of bangles that she is helping in.

Q7. How, in your opinion, can Mukesh realize his dream? How is his attitude different from his parents'?  Or Is it possible for Mukesh to realize his dream? Justify your answer. (Important) (2009)

Ans. The author noticed a spark of hope in Mukesh’s eyes. He was determined to break the lineage of his forefathers by becoming a garage mechanic. It is possible for him to realise his dream because all hurdles are removed if the person is determined. He would walk the long distance to reach the garage. His parents believe in destiny, which they think cannot be changed.

Some More Important Short Answer Type Questions :

Q.1    Who is Mukesh? What is his aim?

Ans.  Mukesh is the son of a bangle-maker. He also makes bangles. The spring (childhood) of his life is also lost. He does not go to school. His aim is to become a motor mechanic. He wants to become his own master.

Q.2    What is the condition of children working in the glass furnace of Firozabad?

Ans.  The condition of children there is very bad. They have to work in unbearable heat. The rooms are very small and without air and light. It badly affects their eyes and health.

Q.3    What kind of locality does Mukesh live in?

Ans.  He lives in a dirty locality. The streets are narrow, full of garbage. A foul smell comes all the time. The walls and doors of the houses are about to crumble (fall down). There is no window. Even animals also live with human beings.

Q.4    Mention the hazards of working in the glass bangles industry.

Ans.  The workers of this industry have to work in unhealthy conditions. They work near hot furnaces. The rooms are very small. There are without air and light. The workers lose the brightness of their eyes at an early age. The powder falling while polishing bangles is very harmful to their eyes.

Q.5    What does the writer say about boys and girls working in dark hutments?

Ans.  These boys and girls also live in the same conditions in which their parents are living. They weld pieces of glass into bangles. The hutments are without proper light and fresh air. Such unhealthy conditions badly affect their eyes and health.

Q.6    Who are the people responsible to keep the bangle-makers in constant poverty?

Ans.  The bangle-maker of Firozabad are victims of a conspiracy ‘Sahukars’, middlemen, policemen, bureaucrats and politicians are responsible for the poverty of these people. They do not let these people come out of poverty - the vicious (evil) circle.

Q.7    How is Mukesh’s attitude different from that of his family?

Ans.  The members of Mukesh’s family believe in fate. His grandmother believes that poverty is because of their ‘Karma’. They have accepted it as inevitable (unavoidable). But Mukesh thinks differently. He wants to become a motor mechanic - the master of himself. The writer had seen a ray of hope in his eyes.

Long Q/Ans.  (“I want to drive a car”)

Q.1    Describe the life of families engaged in making bangles in Ferozabad.

Ans.  Many families in Ferozabad are engaged in making bangles. These families have been doing this job for many years. They work near furnaces. They weld glass and make bangles. Women of different parts of India wear them. About 20,000 children work near these hot furnaces. They endanger their eyes while doing their work. The bangle-makers of Ferozabad are very poor. They live in inhuman conditions. The streets are very narrow. There are full of garbage. The walls and doors of their houses are in crumbling (about to fall) condition. Mukesh’s family also lives in the same area. They are the victims of middlemen, police, and politicians.

Q.2    What did the writer see when Mukesh took him to his home?

Ans.  The condition of that area was very bad. The streets were full of garbage. Those were full of foul smells. The houses were in crumbling condition. The walls and doors were about to fall down. There were no windows. Families of humans and animals lived together in those little houses. Some houses had thatched roofs. Mukesh’s house was a half-built shack (like a shed). There was a firewood stove (hearth). A big vessel was placed on it. A young and weak woman was cooking the evening meal. She was Mukesh’s elder brother’s wife. She is the ‘Bahu’ of the house. She had to cover her face with a veil on her face in front of the elder male members. It was a custom, Mukesh’s father was a poor person. He wanted to repair the house. He also wanted to send his two sons to school. But he failed to do so. Mukesh’s grandfather had become blind due to the dust of the bangles. His grandmother thought it was her ‘Karma’.

Thursday, 30 December 2021

The Myth of Rama-Sita and Ravna in Kanthapura

 The Myth of Rama-Sita and Ravna in Kanthapura

 Ans. The novel Kanthapura really revolves around the myth of Rama-Sita and Ravana. The Ramayana was narrated by the great Sage Valmiki long ago. In the same way, there is a narrator, Achakka, in Kanthapura also, though not a great Sage, but the grandmother of the village Kanthapura.

She compares Gandhiji with lord Rama and India with Sita. Achakka, the narrator says that as Sita was overpowered by the chief of Evil, Ravana, so was the mother India overpowered by the British. The people of India had been made slaves by the British.

The miserable condition of the labourers working at the Skeffington Coffee Estate is the living example of miniature size. One can guess easily how the people of India were being treated under the foreign rule in India at that time. Lord Rama collected the ‘Vanara-sena’ (the army of the monkeys) and attacked Ravana, the king of Lanka (now Sri Lanka), defeated and killed him. Thus Sita was liberated by Rama from Ravana’s slavery.

Here in this novel, we have the same parallels of the events. The novelist, Raja Rao, projects Mahatma Gandhi to lead the people of India to fight against the  British rule in India. In Ramayana, it was Rama, who fought a decisive fight against Ravana. In Kanthapura, the novelist showed Gandhiji a mighty (powerful) hero to defeat the Evil forces to achieve freedom for mother India. He used his powerful weapons of ‘ahimsa, satyagraha and non-violence.

The war between Rama and Ravana had resulted in the deaths of many people. Women were made widows, mothers lost their sons and sisters lost their brothers. Numerous people were injured. In the same way, the freedom struggle led by Mahatma Gandhi resulted in the deaths of many people in Kanthapura and in the rest of the country as well. The people of Kanthapura were arrested, tortured, and lathi-charged by the police.

 Moorthy as a follower of Gandhiji leads the struggle for freedom in Kanthapura. First, he had to struggle hard to unite the people of Kanthapura. He had to go from one door to the other to spread Gandhiji’s ideas among the people of Kanthapura. Rama had with him his mighty warriors like Lakshmana, Sugriva, and  Hanuman. In the same way, though at a very small scale, Moorthy also had his faithful friends with him. He formed the Congress Panchayat Committee with Pariah Ranganna, Range Gowda, and Seenu. Seenu did his selfless service to him as Veer Hanuman did to Lord Rama.

The people of Kanthapura fought against the British forces as Vanaras fought with the Ravana’s forces in Sri Lanka. Mahatma Gandhi’s trip to England has also been equalized to the one taken by Lord Rama to Sri Lanka to liberate Sita from Ravana’s control.

Gandhiji also went to England to attend the second Round Table Conference. Achakka said that Mahatma would go to the ‘Redman's country’ to get swaraj for the people of India. She gives more detail in the novel, that has parallels to the incidents that occurred in the Ramayana.

Thus, we may conclude that Kanathapura revolves around the myths of Rama-Sita and Ravana.

 

 

Kanthapura-The Language, the Narrative Style and the Literary Merits

 Kanthapura-The Language, the Narrative Style and the Literary Merits’ of Kanthapura

 Kanthapura is a successful novel even if it is judged through its narrative style and techniques used by Raja Rao. It was a big challenge for the writer to achieve his goal by writing this novel in English. He had to make some innovations in his narrative style to suit the Indian atmosphere.

 Let’s study this novel in the light of the use of ‘language, the narrative style and the literary merits’ of Kanthapura.

 As we know, it was not an easy task for the writer to narrate a tale of an imaginary village, named Kanthapura, where people had different mindsets and where most of the people were illiterate, following different myths and superstitions. They were the people who were divided on the basis of caste and religion. The writer was to portray them as living beings, clashing with one another to safeguard their personal interests and then to elevate them to unite for the bigger cause of being a part of Gandhiji’s  Movement.

  So the first priority for the writer was to mould the English language according to the people of Kanthapura in order to express their thoughts and feelings, their dreams, and the harsh reality in which they lived. The second necessity for the writer was to select a narrative style. For this, he decided to use an age-old ancient style of story-telling, which is very popular in our country.

 We all have grown up by listening to the tales narrated by our grandmothers in a simple and spontaneous manner. Here, the narrator is Achakka, the village's old grandmother, who narrates the tale of the events that took place long-long ago in Kanthapura. Some of the incidents have become dim in her memory with the passage of time. But whatever she narrates, she narrates wonderfully.

 Raja Rao himself admits the fact that telling a tale is not an easy job when he was to capture the tempo of Indian life in a foreign language. The novelist was to record the swift movements of thoughts and actions that prevail in an average Indian mind. The novelist has done this successfully in Kanthapura.


The writer does not use any flashback that slows down the tempo of the action. Wherever the writer finds space, we come to know about his viewpoint.  The narrator is one of the people living in Kanthapura and it also lends authentication to the events.

We find word pictures in plenty. The novelist has described everything that he thought necessary very minutely. Sometimes our senses of sight, sound, and even smell are stirred. In the first chapter, the movements of the bullock carts on the zigzag ‘kachcha’ roads creating a cloud of dust behind them are marvelous. Similar examples abound in the novel.

 

The novelist has also kept in mind the subject matter that is used by different characters while speaking in the novel. They speak in accordance with the education, religious and cultural values they have acquired in their rural background. Raja Rao has also used Indianised words for certain religious ceremonies like  “God’s birth celebration ceremony”, “rice-eating ceremony”, “hair-cutting ceremony”, “death ceremony”, ‘Sankara-Vijaya’,  ‘Sankara-Jayanthi’,‘Harikathas’, etc. Even in dialogues, the writer has used their local language.

 As a modern writer of great eminence, T.S. Eliot, Raja Rao has also used myths in this novel. It makes the narrative of the novel look more Indian. He has used the myths of the goddess Kenchamma, Lord Rama and Sita, Lord Krishna, Brahma, Siva, etc. Under the umbrella of these religious myths and belief, the people of Kanthapura stand united in the leadership of Moorthy to participate in Gandhiji’s freedom struggle.

Thus, we may say that Raja Rao’s narrative style and the literary devices he used in this novel are superb.