This blog contains discussions on poems, short stories, novels, plays, and literary essays. line-to-line explanation of the poems, dramas, Questions & Answers, etc. You will find poems, lessons, stories, dramas, questions, and answers here. English Literature Made Easy
Wednesday, 29 December 2021
Know Then Thyself-Questions-Answers-Video 2 of 2-English for B A Semeste...
Monday, 27 December 2021
Types of Novels-Picaresque novel-Historical Novel-Psychological Novel
Types of Novels
1. Picaresque novel may be called the earliest experiment in the field of novel. The word ‘picaresque’ has been derived (taken) from the Spanish word ‘Picaro’ that means a ‘rogue’ /rəʊɡ/ (dangerous and harmful) or a ‘knave’ /neɪv/ (dishonest) in English. A picaresque novel has a long narrative that revolves around a person, who is a criminal for society. But, in reality, he helps the poor by duping (cheating) the rich. He is a Robinhood type of character, a highwayman, who suddenly appears and suddenly disappears after finishing his job of robbery.
This theme of appearance versus reality was followed by many
English novelists in the eighteenth century. It was really a very popular
theme. We can quote (cite/give) several examples of this type of novel. Henry
Fielding wrote Tom Jones and Joseph Andrews. Charles Dickens wrote ‘The Pickwick Papers
(1836–37). We have Jonathan Swift’s famous ‘Gulliver’s
Travels’, Mark Twain’s ‘The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn' (1884), and
the recent Thomas Mann’s ‘Confessions of Felix Krull’. The anonymous ‘Lazaillo
De Tormes’ was the true Spanish picaresque novel.
2.Historical Novel
Although
history and historical novels have much in common, yet there is one basic
difference between them. History is based on the recording of facts while in a
historical novel the writer adds imagination to the facts taken from history. The
first historical novel written in the English language is Sir Walter Scott’s
‘Ivanhoe’.
Broadly
speaking, it may be said that one-fourth of all the novels published so far in
the last thirty years have some historical elements in them. After World
War II, the tendency to write historical novels has very much increased. India
may be called the epicentre ( /ˈep.ɪ.sen.tər/ the focal point) of writing
historical novels in English. We have examples of writers who have written
historical novels in India. The list includes the names of the novelists like
Salman Rushdie, Amitav Ghosh, Robinson Mistry, Mukul Keswan, etc. They have
become very successful and well-acknowledged writers of this type.
3. Psychological Novel
The term ‘psychological novel’ came into vogue (trend/fashion) in the modern age of English Literature. The novelists between the period of two world wars wrote fiction that may well be called psychological novels. In this type of novel, the novelist deals with the inner-being, the inner world of his characters. The conflict at the inner stage, that is mind, is depicted by the writers of such novels. Sometimes a person is sitting silently and he or she seems inactive. But, who knows about the conflict that might be going on into the mind of that person? So the writers of such kinds of novels bring out the conflicts that usually go into the minds of human beings. With the researches in the field of psychology done by Freud and Jung, the work in the field of writing psychological novels increased.
The use of ‘streams of consciousness’ became popular in the modern age.
In the past, no one knew the term ‘the streams of consciousness and
‘psychological novel’. But still, we may quote the example of Richardson’s
Pamela (1740) in which the novelist explored the inner reality. D. H. Lawrence
wrote psychological novels like ‘Women in Love’, ‘Sons and Lovers’, and Rainbow.
Virginia Woolf wrote Mrs. Dalloway. James Joyce and William Faulkner are also
the novelists who wrote psychological novels.
Sunday, 26 December 2021
Wounded Plants by Jagadish Chandra Bose: Qs & Ans.
Wounded Plants by Jagadish Chandra Bose: Qs & Ans.
A. Short Answer-type
Qs)
Q1. How can
we realise the pain of the sufferings of the plants?
Ans. The mute may express their feelings of pain by their
agonised expressions on faces or by the convulsive movement of their body parts.
Q2. Why do
we not realise the pain of some living beings?
Ans. It is because human sympathy is often shown to the superior or
to the equal and not to the creatures that are thought to be of lower kinds.
Q3. What
characterises individuals from one another?
Ans. Mainly two things characterise individuals from
one another. The first is the degree of shock one receives (gets) and the
second is the sympathy shown at the sufferings of the other individuals.
Usually, we show our sympathy to those who are higher or equal to us. We hardly
show it to our inferiors.
B. Answer the
following questions in about five sentences each:
Q1. How can
we realise the pain of the sufferings of the plants?
Ans. When
a man receives a tragic blow or shock, his answering cry makes us realise that
he is in some trouble. But the speechless cannot do so. He is unable to express
his sorrow or pain in words. In that case, the mute person may express his
feelings of pain by his agonised expressions on his face or by the convulsive
movement of his body parts.
Thus, we all human beings realise each other’s pain
through fellow-feeling.
C. Answer
the following questions in about 100 words each:
Q1. How can
we realise the pain of the sufferings of the plants?
Ans. When a man receives a tragic blow or shock, his
answering cry makes us realise that he is in some trouble. But the speechless
cannot do so. He is unable to express his sorrow or pain in words. In that
case, the mute person may express his feelings of pain by his agonised
expressions on his face or by the convulsive movement of his body parts.
Thus, we all human beings realise each other’s pain
through fellow-feeling.
The writer quotes an example of a frog to prove that
the animals and small creatures are also mute and they show their pain through
the convulsive movement of their bodies. When a frog is struck with some object, it does not
make a cry out of pain. It shows only its convulsive movement.
Q2. What is the test of livingness by the
author?
Ans. The author proceeds to explain the test of livingness
now. He says that responsive movements are the tests to ascertain (find out) as
to how much vitality (life) is there in the living beings. The living beings
answer to a shock automatically. The most lively (energetic) gives the most
energetic response, the dying gives the feeblest (weakest) and the dead gives
no answer to any shock. Thus life may be tested by the reactions or answers to
the shocks the living beings give automatically.
Q3. What are
the three tests in the ‘series of investigation’ referred to in the essay? What
is their significance?
Ans. Three separate
investigations have been carried out on the wound on plants caused by human
activities or the environment. The first is the shock effect. It retards or stops
the growth of plants. Then the second investigation was performed. It recorded
the change of spontaneous pulsation (beat) of the leaflet of the Telegraph
plant. In the third experiment, it was found that death or decay spreads from
the cut point of the leaflet and it reaches the throbbing tissue. Consequently,
it becomes decayed or dead. All this reveals that plants are living beings.
They feel hurt when they are wounded.
Q4. What is paralysing effect’ How is it measured? What is the result of the ‘paralyzing
effect’?
Ans. An
investigation was carried out on a cut-off leaf and also on its parent plant
mimosa. The investigation shows that the act of cutting the leaf had caused a
big shock to its parent plant.
A shock wave
was spread to the whole of the plant. All the leaves of the plant remained in
depression for several hours. No response came from them. In a way, the shock
had paralyzed the plant for hours together. Gradually, the leaves regained
their sensitivity. The detached leaf was put into a nourishing solution. It
recovers very soon and it shows that it has regained its lost energy. It
continued for twenty-four hours. But after it, a curious change was noted on
the leaf. The nourishing solution could not keep it alive continuously. At
last, the leaf had to surrender in front of the ultimate death.